Dear comrades,
I am sure you are aware of the James von Brunn situation. At least I was able to turn some bad PR lemons into lemonade last night and yesterday, and I got to 1) explain how understandable white anger is, and 2) how Obama needs to assuage heightened white fears about gun and speech control or he will, by everything he does, provoke even more incidents.
I was interviewed at length by ABC Good Morning America, ABC Nightly News, the CBS Early Show, Fox News (Sheppard Smith Report), NBC Nightly News, the Washington Post, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Bloomberg, and Associated Press.
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette photo taken at a downtown Pittsburgh TV studio
I talked to all the electronic and print media about “White Heritage Safety Zones” in every interview — and the cameramen at least were all enthralled!
http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=7811417
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/#31271741 1:44-2:03 (note my JdN website banner was shown and also a speech clip from me.)
I also got many excellent reviews from WNs. A British comrade wrote:
Dear John,
Saw you on BBC TV responding to the horrid event re JvB, and concur with your opinion….
Another Briton wrote:
Hi John,
Excellent job dealing with the media. You represented the WN community exceptionally well!
A comrade in Germany wrote:
Hai Johann!
I just heard your excellent interview on the JvB subject…..
What gratified me was that major news reporters were interviewing me in-depth on my own racial project as well as the Von Brunn tragedy, and although they used on live TV only the direct Von Brunn information I gave them — none of it hostile, but just explanatory – they seemed quite impressed with my Solutrean vision as well. After scheduling me for ten minutes, they often let the cameras roll for 30 minutes (even using up a whole 30-minute-block of satellite time).
(Btw, the interview deal nowadays is the “great NY anchorperson” or reporter just stays put in New York and only a cameraman is there with me in a local studio. The reporter asks me questions from Jew York by speakerphone.)
And I am happy to say that I 1) put the onus on Obama and liberals for white rage, and I helped the truth win out that 2) James von Brunn was indeed acting alone, and thus there was no reason to have any mass government round-up of WN leaders or followers.
I called the Washington Post initially out of a sense of responsibility to our whole movement so as not to let this Von Brunn incident overly harm us all. Since I was one of the last people to speak with him before the tragedy, the media definitely rang my phone off the hook once the Post article appeared.
I also got much hate email, inasmuch as my website (containing my email address) was shown on ABC News, including the usual delusional acusations:
1) “You were never a Marine,” [the enemy senses that my brief but very good Marine career before I was "outed" as a WN enhances my message with white patriots]
2) “you have a low IQ,” [which is why I graduated from Georgetown Universoty with high honors and Phi Beta Kappa...]
and
3) “you are gay….” (This seems a total enemy obsession, and interesting in view of the Jewsmedia otherwise glorifying “gayness” to their Noahide masses as being just fine… But it seems all “neo-Nazi” leaders must be labelled as “gay”…. My fair hair makes me gay, by the way. I really should dye it jet-black….)
The top NY anchors, such as Andrew Cuomo (son of former NY governor Mario Cuomo) were in attack mode from beginning to end, often suggesting it was my fault I had not guessed JvB (a man I had never met) was about to go ballistic.
A young Jew reporter named Goodman tried to get me to denounce other WNs as “white supremacists” after buttering me up as a “racial moderate”…..
I was gratified that a local black female TV reporter in Pittsburgh (for NBC affiliate nWPXI-TV (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPXI-TV) listened very attentively to me on how the Jews 1) ran the colonial slave trade and 2) had “gotten to” Obama, which is what Reverend Jeremiah Wright claimed just a few days ago…. (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/10/wright-suggests-jews-white-house-wont-let-speak-obama/)
This was her video report, which like the others stuck to the Von Brunn story:
http://www.wpxi.com/news/19727856/detail.html
There have been many quotes from me all over the print and online media, as you can see from a search engine with the terms “Von Brunn” and “de Nugent” (3,190 webpages on Google in the last 24 hours)….
Among them, a London Times article:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6481475.ece
Huffington Post (a very big website):
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/11/james-von-brunn-charged-i_n_214404.html
The number-one news radio in the nation’s capital (WTOP):
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=1694189
National Post (huge Canadian paper):
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2009/06/11/holocaust-museum-shooter-james-von-brunn-charged-with-first-degree-murder.aspx
I am also happy to say that most media more or less correctly called me a “white separatist” and NOT a “white supremacist” after I made that point crystal-clear.
* * *
In this one truly defamatory article (link follows) here are two overt lies….
1) I never said the moronic “I condemn JvB’s action; it made us look bad.”
The Jewish editor put together two separate sentences spoken in different parts of the interview.
2) I was not banned from Stormfront for threatening violence, but for suggesting a truth offensive against certain specific top Stormfronters who were defaming me as a homosexual.
This was so far the only article that was full of lies.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/11/responsible-white-separatist/
* * *
When Jews attack and lie, I must be doing my job very well.
Here below, finally, is the article by the major Pittsburgh liberal newspaper (founded in the 1700s, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette).
My tactic throughout has been to emphasize 1) Von Brunn = loner and 2) I regret the shooting — because both statements are indeed true and they help block unfair legal persecution of us all.
![de_nugent_holocaust_vonbrunn_500.jpg picture by JohndeNugent]()
http://www.postgazette.com/pg/09162/976709-100.stm
And now back to finishing my book. Once again, as with the Holappa arrest and the massive character defamation campaign that began the next day against me, I have had to deal with a dangerous and time-robbing situation and turn it around. The Von Brunn incident could have harmed us all, in fact, and severely. Our comments on this shooting must place the onus where it belong: on the menace that Barack Hussein Obama and his terrifying Jewish clique represent to many millions of ;law-abiding white people, and it is the real threat of Obama that is driving more and more sincere Whites to snap and take wrong and desperate measures.
John de Nugent
============On gun control
A liberal wrote me to ask if I did not agree that gun control would have prevented the Von Brunn-security guard tragedy.
I replied:
* * *
As for gun control, and James von Brunn, my understanding is that the gun was 80 years old and was never registered anywhere.
For me, guns are a necessary EVIL, because as long as psychopaths infest governments (and religions and banks and anything that can give them power), the people need some means to make the government fear them. That is in fact what Jefferson said: “The government must fear the people and not the people the government.”
Someday, all psychopaths may be screened out of power, and the only persons who will need guns are ranchers who may encounter rattlesnakes. But the problem is the human rattlesnakes who infest almost every power center in America today.
With guns, we have perhaps 25,000 murders a year out of 340,000,000 people. Without guns, we could have the US become one big gulag where millions die every year, just as happened in Soviet Russia or China. Clinton and two Bushes caused the death of one million just in Iraq! We nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki and incinerated Dresden! This government can never be trusted. Certainly the Amerindians found that out, white people are finding that out, and Thomas Jefferson and the Minutement understood this permanent fact 230 years ago.
I would also like to put some perspective on the shooting at the museum. A security guard was killed. One security guard. He chose that job, which is to protect buildings with his life. What Von Brunn did was tragic and wrong, but it is no reason to overthrow the US Constitution. The solution is to address the fear millions of Americans feel about the Bush-Obama government. (What “change” has Obama brought?)
=================JEWESS HAS CANIPTION OVER THIS POST
Oy vey, opines Rachel Sklar — a goy who doesn’t have a goyishe kop! She bemoans:
This is unbelievable. In last night’s “NBC Nightly News,” Pete Williams had a segment on the Holocaust Museum shooter, James von Brunn, and they presented a guy by the name of John de Nugent to attest to his pre-shooting mental state. Which John de Nugent, you ask? This one – the one who thinks that white men and women should “take back their honor”; the one who says that “When Jews attack and lie, I must be doing my job very well”; the one who thought he should be president and wrote this on his “John de Nugent for President” page: “You will notice my outreach to blacks, appealing to their self-interest. We don’t need a race war with blacks triggered by the Jews who are stage-managing Obama and may yet murder him to start a race war.” Oh. That John de Nugent.
Before I go to the set-up of de Nugent’s highly important contributions to the #1 nightly news show in America, watched by millions, here’s what he thinks of Ben Bernanke: “Ben Bernanke, the Jew who controls all U.S. Money in a nation that is 98% non-Jewish.” (He’s got similar opinions about Jews Michael Mukasey and Michael Chertoff.)
Here’s what he thinks of the whole lot of ‘em: “Do you know your real masters? These leaders of the J-Team, the Jewish power-brokers, run the USA regime of fear — and tell their puppets — Bush, the slick-jiving Obamanation and Cain — what to say and what never to discuss in public about their power and crimes.”
Hmm. Do YOU think he’s a credible source?
NBC did – and so, apparently, did ABC, CBS, WaPo, Bloomberg, AP and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Here’s how he was set-up on NBC Nightly News:
Pete Williams, after introducing von Brunn’s writings, which included comments like “The Holocaust was a lie. Obama was created by Jews” and “Obama does what his Jew-owners tell him to,” then said “A white separatist who talked with him just two weeks ago said Brunn never mentioned President Obama and was worried about money.” Visual: Video of de Nugent speaking at a podium; front page of de Nugent’s website. Then cut to de Nugent himself, suit and tie before a cityscape backdrop – just like any expert! – with “White Separatist” chyroned beneath him, as official-looking as if he were Chuck Todd.
DEEP BREATH.
Why would they give this guy a platform? Did they not read his website? Did they not understand his mission? I get that de Nugent was someone who could speak to von Brunn’s mental state, but what about his mental state? Your “experts” have to be credible. Can we really trust someone who writes about the “J-Team, Jewish power-brokers” as presidential puppeteers to be honest about his buddy who wrote about how “Obama does what his Jew-owners tell him to?” IS THERE MAYBE A CREDIBILITY ISSUE HERE?
There sure is – and if you don’t believe me, well then, take it from John de Nugent himself, courtesy of this crowing, trumphant post on his blog:
Dear comrades,
I am sure you are aware of the James von Brunn situation. At least I was able to turn some bad PR lemons into lemonade last night and yesterday, and I got to 1) explain how understandable white anger is, and 2) how Obama needs to assuage heightened white fears about gun and speech control or he will, by everything he does, provoke even more incidents.
I was interviewed at length by ABC Good Morning America, ABC Nightly News, the CBS Early Show, Fox News (Sheppard Smith Report), NBC Nightly News, the Washington Post, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Bloomberg, and Associated Press.
Congratulations, MSM! Good job on helping this crazy, vile man turn those bad PR lemons into lemonade!
Deep breath again.
Look – as a journalist, media critic and lawyer (AND JEW, I’M SURE DE NUGENT WOULD POINT OUT!), I understand that the goal is to collect the most useful and relevant information, however repugnant the source. But in every case, you have to evaluate the credibility of that source. Is the information verifiable? Is their self-interest implicated? Would they have any compelling reason to spin, misrepresent or lie – and do you have any way of ascertaining that? In this case, the answers are clear: No, the information is not verifiable – the networks and papers were going only on de Nugent’s word. Yes, his self-interest was implicated – his mission seems pretty consistent with that of von Brunn’s, based on their assorted writings. Yes, he had a compelling reason to spin, misrepresent or lie – put it this way, if von Brunn and he had been chatting about how terrible the Jews were and how someone really should do something about it, do you think he would have said so? I sure as hell don’t.
Hell. Now that’s a more appropriate place for this racist, anti-Semitic hatemonger than splashed across NBC Nightly News – or ABC, CBS, AP, WaPo, Bloomberg or any other so-called “credible” news source. Check your facts, people – and your sources.
Related:
VIDEO: Holocaust Museum To Reopen Friday [NBC Nightly News]
FOUL: John de Nugent For President [JohnDeNugent.com]
****Charitini is the personal website of Rachel Sklar, and where she is parking her media criticism before the launch of Mediaite. Otherwise, this site promotes philanthropy and micro-giving through “Charitini Birthdays” in which guests are invited to donate “birthday drinks” to the celebrant’s charity of choice. Learn more here.
[...] about gun and speech control or he will, by everything he does, provoke even more incidents,” said de Nugent, who has also made clear that he believes that “Obama does what his Jew-owners tell him [...]
[...] the media tour of white separatist John de Nugent, a James von Brunn acquaintance, who explains his post-shooting media strategy as he talked about “white heritage safety [...]